Difference-valuation conjecture for partial Stirling functions

From papers

Let 5Δ85\le\Delta\le8, 0m<2e10\le m<2^{e-1}, and e4e\ge4. If

ν(PΔ(m))<e+εΔ,m22,\nu(P_\Delta(m))<e+\varepsilon_{\Delta,m_2}-2,

then the difference-valuation conjecture. For every d0d\ge0,

ν(P2e+Δ(2e1(x+2d)+m)P2e+Δ(2e1x+m))=d+ν(PΔ(m)).\nu\bigl(P_{2^e+\Delta}(2^{e-1}(x+2^d)+m)-P_{2^e+\Delta}(2^{e-1}x+m)\bigr)=d+\nu(P_\Delta(m)).

This is presented as a reduction step toward the one-zero congruence-class conjecture and would control the precise 2-adic variation in each relevant residue class.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Donald M. Davis, “2-adic Stirling functions and their zeros”, arXiv:1402.0433 (2014).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.