Difference-valuation conjecture for partial Stirling functions

About 12 years old · traced to

Let 5≤Δ≤85\le\Delta\le8, 0≤m<2e−10\le m<2^{e-1}, and e≥4e\ge4. If

ν(PΔ(m))<e+εΔ,m2−2,\nu(P_\Delta(m))<e+\varepsilon_{\Delta,m_2}-2,

then the difference-valuation conjecture. For every d≥0d\ge0,

ν(P2e+Δ(2e−1(x+2d)+m)−P2e+Δ(2e−1x+m))=d+ν(PΔ(m)).\nu\bigl(P_{2^e+\Delta}(2^{e-1}(x+2^d)+m)-P_{2^e+\Delta}(2^{e-1}x+m)\bigr)=d+\nu(P_\Delta(m)).

This is presented as a reduction step toward the one-zero congruence-class conjecture and would control the precise 2-adic variation in each relevant residue class.

References

Primary source

Donald M. Davis, “2-adic Stirling functions and their zeros”, arXiv:1402.0433 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.