Hassanzadeh–Nasrollah Nejad–Simis conjecture on Euler conductors

Let kk be a field of characteristic 00, let n≥1n\ge 1, and let f∈(x1,…,xn)2⊂k[[x1,…,xn]]f\in (x_1,\ldots,x_n)^2\subset k[[x_1,\ldots,x_n]] define an isolated critical point at the origin. If Jf=(∂f/∂x1,…,∂f/∂xn)J_f=(\partial f/\partial x_1,\ldots,\partial f/\partial x_n) is the Jacobian ideal, then Jf:f⊈(Jf,f)J_f:f\not\subseteq (J_f,f); equivalently, there exists g∈k[[x1,…,xn]]g\in k[[x_1,\ldots,x_n]] such that gf∈Jfgf\in J_f but g∉(Jf,f)g\notin (J_f,f).

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

An unrefereed preprint claims to prove the conjecture in characteristic zero and gives an example showing that a stronger version is false.

The conjecture of Hassanzadeh, Nasrollah Nejad, and Simis asserts, in characteristic zero, that for an isolated hypersurface singularity with Jacobian ideal JfJ_f, one has Jf:f⊈(Jf,f)J_f:f\not\subseteq (J_f,f). The preprint reformulates this through annihilators and Jordan blocks.

Known results

  • Hassanzadeh, Nasrollah Nejad, and Simis established the plane-curve case; the higher-dimensional statement was left as a conjecture.

Unrefereed preprint (date not stated)

Yizhi Zhang and Huaiqing Zuo claim the characteristic-zero conjecture, and also claim the stronger local noncontainment Jf:f⊈(Jf,f)+n(Jf:f)J_f:f\not\subseteq (J_f,f)+\mathfrak n(J_f:f). They give an isolated singularity over Q[[x1,…,x5]]\mathbb{Q}[[x_1,\ldots,x_5]] for which Jf‾=m3\overline{J_f}=\mathfrak m^3 and Jf:f⊆Jf‾J_f:f\subseteq\overline{J_f}, refuting the proposed integral-closure strengthening.

Current status (as of October 2026): The characteristic-zero conjecture is claimed proved, but remains unverified; the proposed integral-closure strengthening is claimed false by an explicit example.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.