Qiu–Zhang conjecture on separating degenerating slopes

Let MM be a compact orientable simple 33-manifold, let FF be a component of ∂M\partial M with genus at least 22, and let α,β\alpha,\beta be separating slopes on FF. In the reducible–reducible case, if both Dehn fillings M(α)M(\alpha) and M(β)M(\beta) are reducible, then Δ(α,β)=0\Delta(\alpha,\beta)=0; equivalently, α=β\alpha=\beta. The full conjecture concerns the corresponding distance bounds for all separating slopes that yield degenerating Dehn fillings.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new specialist preprint claims the two-reducible-fillings case, but the broader conjecture remains open.

The conjecture concerns distance bounds for separating slopes that produce degenerating Dehn fillings. The full conjecture is not resolved.

Known results

  • Two separating reducing slopes satisfy Δ(α,β)≤4\Delta(\alpha,\beta)\leq 4 on the relevant higher-genus boundary.
  • For torus boundary, Gordon and Luecke obtained Δ(α,β)≤1\Delta(\alpha,\beta)\leq 1 for two reducing slopes.
  • In genus two, at most one separating slope produces a boundary-reducible handle addition.
  • Under additional boundary-compressibility hypotheses, the distance bound improves to Δ(α,β)≤2\Delta(\alpha,\beta)\leq 2.

October 2026 reducible–reducible case

Qilong Guo's preprint Reducible handle additions along separating slopes claims the previously conjectural reducible–reducible case without a boundary-genus restriction. This is substantial partial progress, but it does not settle the full separating-degenerating-slopes conjecture.

Current status (as of October 2026): The reducible–reducible case is claimed as proved, while the full conjecture on separating degenerating slopes remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.