One-barrier characterization of boundary regularity for degenerate parabolic equations

Let p>2p>2, let Ω⊂Rn×R\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R} be a space-time domain, and let z0∈∂Ωz_{0}\in\partial\Omega. For the pp-parabolic equation ∂tu−div⁡(∣∇u∣p−2∇u)=0\partial_{t}u-\operatorname{div}(|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u)=0, does the existence of a single traditional barrier at z0z_{0} imply that z0z_{0} is regular for the Dirichlet problem? Equivalently, does a traditional barrier characterize boundary regularity in the degenerate range p>2p>2?

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2026 unrefereed preprint claims that one suitable barrier does not always guarantee boundary regularity in the degenerate setting.

The problem asks whether existence of a single traditional barrier characterizes boundary regularity for degenerate parabolic equations. Avelin and Parviainen’s recent soda-can classification claims a negative answer in specified pp-parabolic ranges.

Known results

  • Avelin and Parviainen (2015): for 1<p<21<p<2, soda-can domains can be irregular while admitting a traditional barrier.
  • Avelin and Parviainen (2015): for p>2p>2, a positive lower bound on the boundary radius implies irregularity and absence of a traditional barrier.
  • The earlier work left open whether the one-barrier failure also occurs in the degenerate range p>2p>2.

2026 soda-can classification

Avelin and Parviainen claim that, for specified pp and ll ranges, irregularity coexists with a traditional barrier, thereby disproving the one-barrier characterization in those regimes. The result is presented in an unrefereed preprint and has not been independently assessed in the retrieved sources.

Current status (as of October 2026): A preprint claims the characterization fails in specified degenerate pp-parabolic ranges, but that claim is unverified and cases outside those ranges remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.