Reverse square-function conjecture

Let n≥2n\ge 2, let Pn−1={(ξ,∣ξ∣2):ξ∈Rn−1}⊂Rn\mathcal P^{n-1}=\{(\xi,|\xi|^2):\xi\in\mathbb R^{n-1}\}\subset\mathbb R^n, and let ff satisfy supp⁡f^⊂NR−1(Pn−1)\operatorname{supp}\widehat f\subset N_{R^{-1}}(\mathcal P^{n-1}). Decompose f=∑θfθf=\sum_{\theta}f_\theta, where the Fourier supports of the fθf_\theta lie in caps of diameter R−1/2R^{-1/2} on Pn−1\mathcal P^{n-1}. The reverse square-function conjecture asserts that, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0,

∥(∑θ∣fθ∣2)1/2∥L2n/(n−1)(Rn)≲εRε∥f∥L2n/(n−1)(Rn).\left\|\left(\sum_{\theta}|f_\theta|^2\right)^{1/2}\right\|_{L^{2n/(n-1)}(\mathbb R^n)}\lesssim_{\varepsilon}R^{\varepsilon}\|f\|_{L^{2n/(n-1)}(\mathbb R^n)}.

The estimate is known in dimension n=2n=2; the conjecture remains open for n≥3n\ge 3.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new sharp special case improves related estimates, but the conjecture remains open in three or more dimensions.

The reverse square-function conjecture predicts sharp bounds for functions Fourier-supported near a paraboloid. Terence Tao described the higher-dimensional conjecture as open in 2020; the two-dimensional case is known.

Known results

  • n=2n=2: follows from the Córdoba--Fefferman argument, with the logarithmic loss removable.
  • n≥3n\ge 3: the conjecture remains open; it is at least as difficult as related restriction and Kakeya conjectures (Tao, 2020).
  • The known decoupling estimate has been shown sharp in several supercritical regimes, but this does not prove the conjecture (Gan and later work, 2024).

October 2026 strip-decoupling advance

Jacob Glidewell's paper claims a sharp decoupling exponent for strips near the three-dimensional paraboloid, using two-ends Furstenberg incidence bounds. This is a specific partial result, not a solution of the general reverse square-function conjecture.

Current status (as of October 2026): The two-dimensional case is settled, while the general conjecture for n≥3n\ge 3 remains open; the reported three-dimensional strip estimate is claimed progress, not a verified resolution.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.