Fractional clique decomposition threshold conjecture

For every fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0, determine whether the random graph G(n,p)G(n,p) has, with high probability, a fractional triangle decomposition precisely at the conjectured threshold p=(1+o(1))3log⁡n2np=(1+o(1))\sqrt{\frac{3\log n}{2n}}; in particular, the conjecture asserts that p≥(1+ε)3log⁡n2np\ge (1+\varepsilon)\sqrt{\frac{3\log n}{2n}} suffices for a fractional K3K_3-decomposition with high probability, while p≤(1−ε)3log⁡n2np\le (1-\varepsilon)\sqrt{\frac{3\log n}{2n}} does not.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new probabilistic result reaches the correct power-law scale, but the conjectured exact threshold remains open.

Yuster posed the problem in 2007: determine the sharp random-sparsification threshold for fractional triangle decompositions. Mahabaduge and Simkin conjectured the logarithmic threshold in random graphs, while the newer framework also treats uniform hypergraphs.

Known results

  • Mahabaduge and Simkin previously obtained the graph bound p≥n−4/11+o(1)p\ge n^{-4/11+o(1)}.
  • For every fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0, the conjectured graph threshold is p≥(1+ε)3log⁡n2np\geq (1+\varepsilon)\sqrt{\frac{3\log n}{2n}}.

2026 preprint: correct polynomial order

Tuan Tran claims that, for k≥2k\ge 2 and r≥k+1r\ge k+1, G(k)(n,p)G^{(k)}(n,p) has a fractional Kr(k)K_r^{(k)}-decomposition with high probability when p≥n−r−k(rk)−1+εp\ge n^{-\frac{r-k}{\binom{r}{k}-1}+\varepsilon}. For triangles this gives p≥n−1/2+o(1)p\ge n^{-1/2+o(1)}, closing the previous polynomial gap, but it does not prove the conjectured logarithmic threshold or an exact constant.

Current status (as of October 2026): The correct polynomial-order threshold is claimed for random graphs and uniform hypergraphs, but the sharp logarithmic threshold conjecture remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.