← All problems

Hilbert's twelfth problem

Let KK be a number field and fix an algebraic closure Kˉ\bar K. Let Kab⊂KˉK^{\mathrm{ab}}\subset\bar K be the maximal abelian extension of KK. For a modulus m\mathfrak m of KK, let K(m)K(\mathfrak m) be the ray class field of conductor dividing m\mathfrak m. Class field theory gives

Gal⁡(K(m)/K)≅Clm(K),Kab=⋃mK(m),\operatorname{Gal}(K(\mathfrak m)/K)\cong\mathrm{Cl}_{\mathfrak m}(K),\qquad K^{\mathrm{ab}}=\bigcup_{\mathfrak m}K(\mathfrak m),

where Clm(K)\mathrm{Cl}_{\mathfrak m}(K) is the ray class group. Class field theory proves these fields exist, but it does not produce generators for them.

Two cases have explicit answers.

  • K=QK=\mathbb Q (Kronecker–Weber). Q(m)\mathbb Q(\mathfrak m) is generated by values of e2πize^{2\pi i z} at rational points:
Qab=Q(e2πi/m:m≥1).\mathbb Q^{\mathrm{ab}}=\mathbb Q\bigl(e^{2\pi i/m}: m\ge1\bigr).
  • KK imaginary quadratic (complex multiplication). Let EE be an elliptic curve over C\mathbb C with End⁡(E)≅OK\operatorname{End}(E)\cong\mathcal O_K, and let hh be a Weber function on EE (for example, the xx-coordinate in a Weierstrass model, suitably normalized). Then
Kab=K(j(E), h(P):P∈Etors),K^{\mathrm{ab}}=K\bigl(j(E),\,h(P): P\in E_{\mathrm{tors}}\bigr),

and j(E)j(E) and h(P)h(P) are special values of the modular function jj and of elliptic functions.

Problem (Hilbert's twelfth problem). For every number field KK, give an explicit construction of KabK^{\mathrm{ab}} of the same kind. That is, specify analytic functions attached to KK, defined without reference to class field theory, and explicit arguments depending on KK and m\mathfrak m. Their special values must be computable to any precision by an algorithm from KK and m\mathfrak m, and must generate K(m)K(\mathfrak m) over KK for every modulus m\mathfrak m. A solution must prove the generation statement.

Totally real fields have an unconditional answer by pp-adic formulas (Dasgupta–Kakde, below). The problem is open for number fields that are neither totally real nor imaginary quadratic. These include CM fields of degree at least 44 and fields that are neither totally real nor CM. A construction for totally real fields by archimedean special values, as predicted by Stark's conjectures, is also open [3, 6].

Background

Hilbert posed the problem as the twelfth of his 1900 list [1]. He asked how Kronecker's theorem on abelian extensions of Q\mathbb Q and the theory of complex multiplication for imaginary quadratic fields extend to an arbitrary algebraic base field. Kronecker called the imaginary quadratic statement his "liebster Jugendtraum".

For a CM field KK of degree at least 44, the theory of complex multiplication of abelian varieties, due to Shimura and Taniyama, produces explicit abelian extensions of the reflex field from values of Siegel modular functions at CM points [2]. These extensions do not in general exhaust the maximal abelian extension.

Stark's conjectures [3] predict that leading terms at s=0s=0 of LL-functions of abelian extensions are logarithms of units, the Stark units, in those extensions. For a totally real base field, the rank-one Stark units should generate abelian extensions, which would give an archimedean solution. Gross formulated pp-adic analogues, the Gross–Stark conjectures. Darmon and Vonk proposed a theory of "real multiplication" using rigid meromorphic cocycles for real quadratic fields [4].

References
  1. D. Hilbert, "Mathematical problems", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1902), 437–479. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1902-00923-3
  2. G. Shimura, Abelian Varieties with Complex Multiplication and Modular Functions, Princeton Univ. Press (1998). doi:10.1515/9781400883943
  3. H. M. Stark, "LL-functions at s=1s=1. IV. First derivatives at s=0s=0", Adv. Math. 35 (1980), 197–235. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(80)90049-3
  4. H. Darmon and J. Vonk, "Singular moduli for real quadratic fields: a rigid analytic approach", Duke Math. J. 170 (2021), 23–93. doi:10.1215/00127094-2020-0035
  5. S. Dasgupta and M. Kakde, "On the Brumer–Stark conjecture", Ann. of Math. 197 (2023), 289–388. doi:10.4007/annals.2023.197.1.5
  6. S. Dasgupta and M. Kakde, "Brumer–Stark units and explicit class field theory", Duke Math. J. 173 (2024), 1477–1555. doi:10.1215/00127094-2023-0039 arXiv:2103.02516
  7. S. Dasgupta and M. Kakde, "On the Brumer–Stark conjecture and refinements", in International Congress of Mathematicians 2022, EMS Press (2023), 1768–1799. doi:10.4171/ICM2022/124
  8. Wikipedia, Hilbert's twelfth problem.

Source: ProofAtlas open problems; International Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Recent progress on Hilbert's 12th problem (2024)

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.