← All problems

Global Langlands functoriality conjecture

Let FF be a number field with adele ring AF\mathbb A_F and absolute Galois group ΓF=Gal⁡(Fˉ/F)\Gamma_F=\operatorname{Gal}(\bar F/F). For a connected reductive group GG over FF, let G^\hat G be its complex dual group, with the action of ΓF\Gamma_F obtained from a pinning. The LL-group is the semidirect product

LG=G^⋊ΓF.{}^LG=\hat G\rtimes\Gamma_F .

Let HH and GG be quasi-split connected reductive groups over FF. An LL-homomorphism ρ ⁣:LH→LG\rho\colon{}^LH\to{}^LG is a continuous homomorphism that commutes with the projections to ΓF\Gamma_F and whose restriction to H^\hat H is a morphism of complex algebraic groups.

An automorphic representation of G(AF)G(\mathbb A_F) is an irreducible constituent of the space of automorphic forms on G(F)\G(AF)G(F)\backslash G(\mathbb A_F), in the sense of Borel and Jacquet [3]. It factors as π=⨂v′πv\pi=\bigotimes_v'\pi_v. Let SS be a finite set of places containing the archimedean places and the places where GG, HH or the given representations ramify. For v∉Sv\notin S, πv\pi_v is unramified, and the Satake isomorphism attaches to it a semisimple G^\hat G-conjugacy class

c(πv)⊂G^⋊Frob⁡v⊂LG.c(\pi_v)\subset\hat G\rtimes\operatorname{Frob}_v\subset{}^LG .

Conjecture (global functoriality). For every FF, HH, GG and ρ\rho as above, and every automorphic representation π′\pi' of H(AF)H(\mathbb A_F), there is an automorphic representation π\pi of G(AF)G(\mathbb A_F) and a finite set of places SS such that

c(πv)=ρ(c(πv′))for every place v∉S.c(\pi_v)=\rho\bigl(c(\pi'_v)\bigr)\qquad\text{for every place } v\notin S .

This is the weak, almost-everywhere form [1, 4]. It implies the equality of partial LL-functions

LS(s,π,r)=LS(s,π′,r∘ρ)L^S(s,\pi,r)=L^S(s,\pi',r\circ\rho)

for every finite-dimensional representation rr of LG{}^LG. A stronger form asks that πv\pi_v correspond to πv′\pi'_v under local functoriality at every place. The problem here is the conjecture as stated, for all HH, GG and ρ\rho. Many individual cases are theorems, listed below.

Background

Langlands formulated functoriality in his 1967 letter to Weil and in his 1970 paper "Problems in the theory of automorphic forms" [1]. Borel's Corvallis article fixed the language of LL-groups and LL-homomorphisms used today [2]. Arthur's surveys explain the principle and its place in the Langlands program [4, 14].

The case H={1}H=\{1\} contains Artin's conjecture. A continuous representation σ ⁣:ΓF→GLn(C)\sigma\colon\Gamma_F\to\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb C) with finite image defines an LL-homomorphism L{1}=ΓF→LGLn{}^L\{1\}=\Gamma_F\to{}^L\mathrm{GL}_n. Functoriality then gives an automorphic representation of GLn(AF)\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb A_F) with the same LL-function. This implies Artin's conjecture that L(s,σ)L(s,\sigma) is entire when σ\sigma is irreducible and nontrivial. Functoriality for the tensor product map GLm×GLn→GLmn\mathrm{GL}_m\times\mathrm{GL}_n\to\mathrm{GL}_{mn} and for symmetric powers would imply the generalized Ramanujan conjecture for GLn\mathrm{GL}_n.

Most established cases use one of three tools: the trace formula and its stabilization, converse theorems combined with Langlands–Shahidi LL-functions, or modularity lifting for Galois representations.

References
  1. R. P. Langlands, "Problems in the theory of automorphic forms", in Lectures in Modern Analysis and Applications III, Lecture Notes in Math. 170, Springer (1970), 18–61. doi:10.1007/BFb0079065
  2. A. Borel, "Automorphic LL-functions", in Automorphic Forms, Representations and LL-Functions (Corvallis, 1977), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, Part 2, AMS (1979), 27–61. doi:10.1090/pspum/033.2/546608
  3. A. Borel and H. Jacquet, "Automorphic forms and automorphic representations", in Automorphic Forms, Representations and LL-Functions (Corvallis, 1977), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, Part 1, AMS (1979), 189–202. doi:10.1090/pspum/033.1/546598
  4. J. Arthur, "The principle of functoriality", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003), 39–53. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00963-1
  5. J. Arthur and L. Clozel, Simple Algebras, Base Change, and the Advanced Theory of the Trace Formula, Annals of Math. Studies 120, Princeton Univ. Press (1989). doi:10.1515/9781400882403
  6. S. Gelbart and H. Jacquet, "A relation between automorphic representations of GL(2)\mathrm{GL}(2) and GL(3)\mathrm{GL}(3)", Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 11 (1978), 471–542. doi:10.24033/asens.1355
  7. D. Ramakrishnan, "Modularity of the Rankin–Selberg LL-series, and multiplicity one for SL(2)\mathrm{SL}(2)", Ann. of Math. 152 (2000), 45–111. doi:10.2307/2661379
  8. H. H. Kim and F. Shahidi, "Functorial products for GL2×GL3\mathrm{GL}_2\times\mathrm{GL}_3 and the symmetric cube for GL2\mathrm{GL}_2", Ann. of Math. 155 (2002), 837–893. doi:10.2307/3062134
  9. H. H. Kim, "Functoriality for the exterior square of GL4\mathrm{GL}_4 and the symmetric fourth of GL2\mathrm{GL}_2", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 139–183. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-02-00410-1
  10. J. W. Cogdell, H. H. Kim, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and F. Shahidi, "Functoriality for the classical groups", Publ. Math. IHÉS 99 (2004), 163–233. doi:10.1007/s10240-004-0020-z
  11. J. Arthur, The Endoscopic Classification of Representations: Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups, AMS Colloquium Publications 61 (2013). doi:10.1090/coll/061
  12. C. P. Mok, "Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups", Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 235 (2015), no. 1108. doi:10.1090/memo/1108
  13. J. Newton and J. A. Thorne, "Symmetric power functoriality for holomorphic modular forms", Publ. Math. IHÉS 134 (2021), 1–116; part II, ibid., 117–152. doi:10.1007/s10240-021-00127-3
  14. J. Arthur, "An introduction to Langlands functoriality", in The Genesis of the Langlands Program, LMS Lecture Note Ser. 467, Cambridge Univ. Press (2021), 109–129. doi:10.1017/9781108591218.016
  15. Wikipedia, Langlands program.

Source: ProofAtlas open problems; Classifying automorphic representations, Clay collected-works item76

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.