Cañete–Miranda Jr–Vittone planar strip isoperimetric conjecture
Let be a horizontal strip in , and let the density be on and on . For every and every admissible four-arc region , there should exist an admissible three-arc region such that and , where denotes weighted perimeter. Equivalently, no four-arc region can be isoperimetric when a three-arc competitor with the same weighted area is available.
References
Primary source
Additional references
- A comparison theorem for the planar strip isoperimetric problem — arXiv — Skilyn Leon, Rosa Pavlak, Evelyn Pulla, Xi Sisi Shen
Progress summary
A new unrefereed preprint claims to settle the conjecture for every allowed density contrast, but the claim has not been independently verified.
Cañete, Miranda Jr., and Vittone posed the conjecture in 2009 for a planar strip whose density is inside the strip and outside it.
Known results
- Cañete, Miranda Jr., and Vittone (2009): the first candidate family is optimal for .
- For , the second candidate family is optimal, with .
- For , the third or fourth candidate family is optimal; for , the third is optimal.
- The fourth family never occurs when , settling the conjectured classification in that range.
September 2026 claimed resolution
Skilyn Leon, Rosa Pavlak, Evelyn Pulla, and Xi Sisi Shen’s preprint A comparison theorem for the planar strip isoperimetric problem claims a reduction valid for every , with an explicit positive perimeter gap, and therefore claims the full conjecture is settled. This is a newly posted, unrefereed claim with no independent verification reported in the retrieved sources.
Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is classically settled for and claimed settled for all by a new unverified preprint; the remaining general claim is not independently confirmed.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.