Hartsfield–Ringel antimagic conjecture
For every finite connected graph with , there exists a bijection such that the vertex-sums are pairwise distinct; that is, for all distinct vertices .
References
Primary source
Additional references
- Antimagicness of join graphs — arXiv — Grégoire Beaudoire, Cédric Bentz, Christophe Picouleau
Progress summary
A September 2026 preprint claims the conjecture for every join graph with at least three vertices, but the general conjecture remains open.
Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph other than has an antimagic labeling, meaning all vertex incident-edge sums are distinct. The conjecture remains unresolved for arbitrary connected graphs.
Known results
- Paths, stars, cycles, complete graphs, wheels, and for are antimagic.
- Graphs with minimum degree at least and complete multipartite graphs other than are antimagic (2003).
- Graphs with sufficiently large average degree are antimagic when isolated vertices and isolated edges are absent (2014).
- Regular graphs and several further tree classes are known cases; the local antimagic conjecture is weaker and does not settle this problem.
September 28, 2026 claimed join-graph advance
A preprint by Grégoire Beaudoire, Cédric Bentz, and Christophe Picouleau claims that every join graph with at least three vertices admits an antimagic labeling. This establishes a broad new family if correct, but it does not prove the full conjecture and has not been independently verified in the retrieved sources.
Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is proved for many graph classes and is claimed for all join graphs with at least three vertices, but it remains open for arbitrary connected graphs other than .
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.