Dominating Hadwiger conjecture

For every integer t≥1t\ge 1 and every graph GG with χ(G)≥t\chi(G)\ge t, there exist pairwise vertex-disjoint connected subgraphs T1,…,TtT_1,\dots,T_t such that, for every pair 1≤i<j≤t1\le i<j\le t and every vertex v∈V(Tj)v\in V(T_j), the vertex vv has a neighbor in TiT_i. Such a collection is called a dominating KtK_t-model.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new preprint claims to disprove the conjecture, but the counterexample has not yet been independently verified.

The conjecture asks whether every graph with chromatic number at least tt contains a dominating KtK_t-model. Illingworth and Wood introduced the notion; Norin later named the conjecture and reportedly suspected it was false.

Known results

  • The conjecture was proved for t=4t=4 by Illingworth and Wood.
  • Every graph with no dominating K5K_5-model is 44-colorable (Norin; later reported as “The Dominating 4-Colour Theorem”).
  • It holds for all 2K22K_2-free graphs.
  • Average degree Ct(log⁡t)2C t(\log t)^2 guarantees a dominating KtK_t-model, a substantial relaxation of the conjecture.

September 28, 2026 claimed disproof

Freddie Illingworth and Raphael Steiner’s new preprint claims a construction showing that chromatic number at least tt need not force a dominating KtK_t-model, which would refute the conjecture. The authors describe the construction as found by ChatGPT 6 Astra Ultra; the mathematical claim remains unverified.

Current status (as of September 2026): Earlier special cases and relaxations are established, while a new preprint claims a counterexample to the full conjecture; that disproof remains unverified.

  • ChatGPT 6 Astra Ultrasolved2026-09-28evidence

    Dominating Hadwiger conjecture disproved

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.