Choie–Zagier, Ghys, and Simon questions on modular integrals and modular-knot linking numbers

For every modular knot KK, construct explicitly a weight-22 modular integral FKF_K for SL2(Z)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}) such that, for every modular knot LL, the homogenized cycle integral of FKF_K associated with LL equals the linking number lk⁡(K,L)\operatorname{lk}(K,L). Equivalently in the Choie–Zagier formulation, construct weight-22 modular integrals having prescribed rational period functions.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims to solve the construction problem, but the claim has not been independently checked.

The problem asks for each modular knot KK an explicit weight-22 modular integral whose cycle integrals recover lk⁡(K,L)\operatorname{lk}(K,L) for every modular knot LL, equivalently realizing prescribed rational period functions. It combines questions associated with Choie–Zagier, Ghys, and Simon.

Known results

  • Ghys (2006) identified linking with the trefoil through the Rademacher invariant; his 2007 question concerned linking between arbitrary modular knots.
  • Kennedy (1994) proved a related linking formula for Lorenz links.
  • Duke, Imamoğlu, and Tóth developed weight-22 cocycle formulas for null-homologous combinations of modular knots.
  • Simon (2025) derived further formulas for linking numbers between modular knots, without claiming the requested modular-integral construction.

September 2026 claimed solution

Matsusaka’s preprint claims explicit unsymmetrized weight-22 modular integrals for individual modular knots and says they answer the cited linking-number questions. This is a new, unrefereed claim and has not been independently verified in the retrieved sources.

Current status (as of September 2026): Matsusaka’s preprint claims a complete answer, but the construction and its linking-number consequences remain unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.