The exceptional set of the Goldbach problem

∀n∈Z\forall n\in\mathbb{Z} with n>2n>2 and n≡0(mod2)n\equiv 0\pmod{2}, there exist primes p,qp,q such that n=p+qn=p+q.

References

Primary source

Analysis Mathematica

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A 2026 paper improves quantitative information about Goldbach exceptions but does not show that every even number is a sum of two primes.

The problem concerns the exceptional set E(X)\mathcal{E}(X) of even integers up to XX that are not representable as the sum of two primes. Eliminating this set would settle the binary Goldbach conjecture, but current work establishes bounds rather than its emptiness.

Known results

  • Montgomery and Vaughan (1975) proved an effective power-saving bound ∣E(X)∣≤X1−δ|\mathcal{E}(X)|\leq X^{1-\delta} for some effectively computable δ>0\delta>0.
  • Pintz later made the exponent explicit, with δ=0.28\delta=0.28.
  • Under the hypothesis that Dirichlet LL-function zeros have real part at most Θ<3/4\Theta<3/4, the 2026 paper records ∣E(X)∣≪εX2Θ−12+ε|\mathcal{E}(X)|\ll_{\varepsilon}X^{2\Theta-\frac12+\varepsilon}; this remains conditional.

2026 explicit major-arc formula

Bhowmik and Grimmelt add a fully explicit major-arc formula retaining contributions from Dirichlet LL-function zeros. They also show conditionally that a sufficiently sparse Hardy–Littlewood estimate for r2(N)r_2(N) rules out sufficiently close exceptional real zeros, including Siegel zeros. Neither result proves that E(X)\mathcal{E}(X) is empty, and the paper’s claims have not been independently verified here.

Current status (as of September 2026): Quantitative unconditional bounds and new conditional information are known, but whether E(X)\mathcal{E}(X) is empty for every XX remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.