Ding–Ding antichain-polynomial Conjecture 4.2

For every k,n≥1k,n\ge 1, let Ak,n(1)(x)A_{k,n}^{(1)}(x) and Ak,n(2)(x)A_{k,n}^{(2)}(x) denote each specified pair of antichain-polynomial sums associated with [k]×Q[k]\times Q, where Q=[2]×[n]Q=[2]\times[n]. The conjecture asserts that every such pair has a common interlacer: there exists a real-rooted polynomial hk,n(x)h_{k,n}(x) that interlaces both Ak,n(1)(x)A_{k,n}^{(1)}(x) and Ak,n(2)(x)A_{k,n}^{(2)}(x). The supplied sources do not give the explicit definitions of the two antichain-polynomial sums.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims to settle the conjecture for two-row shapes, but the result has not yet been peer reviewed.

Ding and Dong posed Conjecture 4.2 in 2019 for Q=[2]×[n]Q=[2]\times[n]: specified pairs of antichain-polynomial sums should have common interleavers. They noted that this would imply real-rootedness of the corresponding antichain polynomial.

Known results

The 2019 paper states that Conjecture 4.2 would imply real-rootedness of N[2]×[n]×[k](x)\mathcal{N}_{[2]\times[n]\times[k]}(x), formulated there as Conjecture 4.3 (Ding and Dong, 2019).

September 2026 claimed proof

A September 22, 2026 report says Jian Ding and Lingen Ding establish real stability for adjacent-shape bivariate polynomials and apply the Chudnovsky–Seymour compatibility criterion to obtain the required common interleaver, thereby proving Conjecture 4.2 for two-row Ferrers shapes. The associated preprint is not yet peer reviewed.

Current status (as of September 2026): Conjecture 4.2 is claimed proved for the stated two-row setting, but independent verification remains outstanding.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.