Budur’s translated-linear-subvariety conjecture for Bernstein–Sato ideals

For a tuple of polynomials f=(f1,…,fr)f=(f_1,\ldots,f_r) and a monoid ideal K⊆NrK\subseteq\mathbb{N}^r, let BfK⊆C[s1,…,sr]B_f^K\subseteq\mathbb{C}[s_1,\ldots,s_r] be the corresponding Bernstein–Sato ideal and let V(BfK)⊆CrV(B_f^K)\subseteq\mathbb{C}^r denote its zero locus. Budur's conjecture asserts that V(BfK)V(B_f^K) is a finite union of translates q+Lq+L, where q∈Qrq\in\mathbb{Q}^r and L⊆CrL\subseteq\mathbb{C}^r is a linear subspace defined over Q\mathbb{Q}.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims a counterexample to Budur’s global structure conjecture, but the result has not been independently verified.

Budur’s conjecture proposes that Bernstein–Sato ideals have a global zero-set structure built from translated linear pieces. Budur formulated it in 2012, with a published account in 2015, and established only partial results, including the hyperplane-arrangement case.

Known results

  • Budur (2012; published 2015) formulated the global and local conjectures and proved partial containment results.
  • Budur (2012; published 2015) verified the corresponding monodromy statement for hyperplane arrangements.
  • Later work listed by Budur includes zero-locus results from 2021 through 2025, but the retrieved descriptions do not state a disproof of this conjecture.

September 2026 counterexample claim

Wenzong Guo, Lei Wu, and Fanghan Xiang claim explicit formulas for several Bernstein–Sato ideals and exhibit a zero locus that is not a finite union of translated linear subvarieties, thereby disproving the proposed global structure theorem. This remains an unrefereed preprint result.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is claimed disproved by an unrefereed preprint, but the counterexample and its computations remain unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.