Strong spacelike curve convergence conjecture
For every closed smooth strong spacelike curve of index , the solution of the usual curve-shortening flow exists up to a finite time and shrinks to a circular point: after a suitable translation and rescaling by factors tending to infinity as , the rescaled curves converge smoothly, in fact exponentially, to a centered unit circle contained in a spacelike -plane. The result is asserted in the cited work under additional geometric hypotheses, including that the curve admits a one-to-one convex projection onto a spacelike plane.
References
Primary source
Additional references
- Weighted normalized curve shortening flow with applications in pseudo-Euclidean spaces — arXiv — Baichuan Hu, Xiang Ma
Progress summary
A recent paper claims to settle the conjecture under specific geometric assumptions, while showing that lightlike degeneration is the alternative outside the convergent case.
The conjecture concerns the behavior under curve-shortening flow of closed strong spacelike curves of index in . The claimed conclusion is convergence, after rescaling, to a circular point in a spacelike plane; the result is conditional on the geometric hypotheses stated in the paper.
Known results
- Andrews and Zhou proved round-point convergence for compact spacelike-convex submanifolds with one spacelike codimension; the cited source says this includes closed strong spacelike curves of index in .
Claimed proof; date not stated
Baichuan Hu and Xiang Ma claim in “Weighted normalized curve shortening flow with applications in pseudo-Euclidean spaces” that their Theorem 9.2 proves the strong-spacelike convergence conjecture in the index- setting. Their broader theorem gives a dichotomy: either the flow develops null degeneration, or it shrinks to a point and the rescaled curves converge smoothly and exponentially to a centered unit circle; an explicit null-degenerate example is also given. No independent verification or reported gap was found.
Current status (as of September 2026): the index- conjecture is claimed proved under the paper’s stated geometric hypotheses, but that claim remains unverified and broader cases remain open.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.