Whitham highest-wave asymptotic-expansion conjecture

Let φ\varphi be a highest-wave profile for a Whitham-type equation, with crest at x=0x=0 and crest regularity φ∈Cs\varphi\in C^{s} for some s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1). The conjecture asserts that, for every integer n≥0n\ge 0, the derivative ∂xnφ(x)\partial_x^n\varphi(x) has the complete asymptotic expansion at the crest predicted by the leading-order highest-wave expansion, as x→0x\to0. The supplied sources do not state the explicit asymptotic scale or coefficients of this expansion.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 paper claims to prove the full higher-order wave-crest expansion, but the result has not yet been independently verified.

The conjecture predicts a complete asymptotic expansion for derivatives of highest Whitham waves near their singular crests. Earlier work established the leading cusp and partial correction estimates; the new paper claims the entire expansion in a substantial parameter range.

Known results

  • 2016: Existence of a highest cusped periodic Whitham wave and its leading crest asymptotic were proved.
  • 2018: Convexity and a sharper local remainder estimate were established.
  • Earlier work: Leading-order constants and first-derivative asymptotics were determined for Whitham-type dispersive orders.

September 2026 higher-order proof

Ehrnström, Mæhlen, and Varholm report that strong induction proves all higher-order asymptotic limits for s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1), while interval arithmetic establishes the zeroth-order estimate only for s∈[0.35,1)s\in[0.35,1). Thus the full conjectured expansion is claimed in that latter range; extending the base estimate to all s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1) remains open.

Current status (as of September 2026): A paper claims the conjecture for s∈[0.35,1)s\in[0.35,1), while the extension to all s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1) and independent verification remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.