Baeza-Yates–Culberson–Rawlins shoreline-search conjecture

Let a ship start at the origin and follow an arbitrary deterministic unit-speed path γ:[0,∞)→R2\gamma:[0,\infty)\to\mathbb{R}^2. For every straight line L⊂R2L\subset\mathbb{R}^2 with d(L):=dist⁡(0,L)>0d(L):=\operatorname{dist}(0,L)>0, let τγ(L):=inf⁡{t≥0:γ(t)∈L}\tau_\gamma(L):=\inf\{t\ge 0:\gamma(t)\in L\}, and define the competitive ratio R(γ):=sup⁡Lτγ(L)/d(L)R(\gamma):=\sup_L \tau_\gamma(L)/d(L). The conjecture is that inf⁡γR(γ)\inf_\gamma R(\gamma) is attained by the appropriate logarithmic-spiral search path, and that inf⁡γR(γ)=Csp=13.8111351794611…\inf_\gamma R(\gamma)=C_{\mathrm{sp}}=13.8111351794611\ldots.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A computer-assisted manuscript claims to prove that the logarithmic spiral is the best possible shoreline-search strategy, but independent verification is still absent.

The conjecture asks whether the logarithmic spiral is optimal among all deterministic search paths, not only spiral-like paths. The underlying conjecture dates to work from 2005 by Baeza-Yates, Culberson, and Rawlins.

Known results

  • The best known logarithmic spiral has ratio 13.81113517946…13.81113517946\ldots.
  • The unconditional lower bound is 12.5937096701246675…12.5937096701246675\ldots, without cyclicity, self-similarity, spiral, or angular-monotonicity assumptions.
  • The 2005 analyses supplied compelling but incomplete evidence for spiral optimality.

September 2026 claimed proof

Alexander Temerev’s arXiv article claims an explicit storage function plus interval-arithmetic verification over roughly one million boxes, matching the spiral lower bound. However, another September 2026 arXiv account records the unequal bounds above and says optimality remains open; the claimed resolution is therefore unverified.

Current status (as of September 2026): A claimed computer-assisted proof would settle the conjecture, but the only independently described bounds remain 12.5937096701246675…≤C2∗≤13.81113517946…12.5937096701246675\ldots\le C_2^*\le13.81113517946\ldots, so equality and external validation remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.