Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness and Euler blow-up problems

For the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations ∂tu+(u⋅∇)u=−∇p+νΔu\partial_t u+(u\cdot\nabla)u=-\nabla p+\nu\Delta u, ∇⋅u=0\nabla\cdot u=0, with ν>0\nu>0 and smooth divergence-free initial data u(0,x)=u0(x)u(0,x)=u_0(x), determine whether every smooth solution remains smooth for all t≥0t\ge 0, or whether there exist smooth initial data for which a finite-time singularity occurs. For the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations ∂tu+(u⋅∇)u=−∇p\partial_t u+(u\cdot\nabla)u=-\nabla p, ∇⋅u=0\nabla\cdot u=0, determine whether there exist smooth divergence-free initial data and a finite time T<∞T<\infty such that the solution becomes singular as t↑Tt\uparrow T; equivalently, whether every smooth Euler solution remains smooth for all t≥0t\ge 0.

References

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

OpenAI announced claimed breakthroughs on both fluid-flow problems, but neither has independent mathematical validation and both remain unconfirmed.

These problems ask whether three-dimensional fluid equations stay smooth forever, and whether the corresponding inviscid flow can develop a singularity in finite time.

September 19, 2026 repository deposit and September claims

On September 8, 2026, OpenAI announced claimed constructions for finite-time singularity in forced three-dimensional Navier–Stokes and for blow-up in unforced three-dimensional Euler, with Lean formalization involving GPT-6 Astra. The accompanying manuscripts state the claimed theorems, but independent validation is absent. A September 17 preprint imposes regularity constraints on features attributed to the Navier–Stokes construction, without refuting it. On September 19, 2026, a repository version again claimed proofs for both problems; its title and physical framing do not establish acceptance.

Current status (as of September 2026): OpenAI’s Navier–Stokes and unforced Euler resolutions remain claimed but unverified; no accepted proof or independent validation has been found.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.