Quantum Hedetniemi conjecture

For all finite graphs GG and HH, the quantum chromatic number of their categorical product satisfies χq(G×H)=min⁡{χq(G),χq(H)}\chi_q(G\times H)=\min\{\chi_q(G),\chi_q(H)\}, where G×HG\times H has vertex set V(G)×V(H)V(G)\times V(H) and (g,h)(g,h) is adjacent to (g′,h′)(g',h') exactly when gg is adjacent to g′g' in GG and hh is adjacent to h′h' in HH.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims a formally checked counterexample that would disprove the quantum conjecture and several related versions, but independent verification is not recorded.

The conjecture asserts that the quantum chromatic number of a graph product equals the smaller quantum chromatic number of its factors: χq(G×H)=min⁡{χq(G),χq(H)}\chi_q(G \times H)=\min\{\chi_q(G),\chi_q(H)\}.

Known results

  • A 2013 paper proves the formula when each factor satisfies χq=ϑˉ\chi_q=\bar{\vartheta}, including orthogonality graphs, but states that the general conjecture remained unproved.
  • The same paper proves the quantum analogue for Cartesian products: χq(G□H)=max⁡{χq(G),χq(H)}\chi_q(G \square H)=\max\{\chi_q(G),\chi_q(H)\}.
  • A 2014 paper develops commuting, approximate, and related quantum chromatic parameters without resolving this conjecture.

September 2026 counterexample

A preprint by Julius A. Zeiss claims a counterexample, with graph constructions, certificates, and projective statements formalized in Lean 4. It claims simultaneous refutations for spatial, approximate, commuting-operator, and C∗C^*-algebraic quantum chromatic numbers; this claim is unverified.

Current status (as of September 2026): The classical special cases are established, while a September 2026 preprint claims to refute the conjecture and its listed variants, but the counterexample has not been independently verified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.