Ambrosio's barycenter curvature-dimension problem

For every metric-measure space (X,d,m)(X,d,\mathfrak m), every K∈RK\in\mathbb R, and every 1<N<∞1<N<\infty, is BCD(K,N)\mathrm{BCD}(K,N) equivalent to RCD(K,N)\mathrm{RCD}(K,N)? Equivalently, does the barycenter curvature-dimension condition characterize Riemannian curvature-dimension spaces?

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new unrefereed preprint claims to solve the problem by proving that the barycenter condition exactly characterizes the relevant curvature spaces.

The problem asks whether barycenter entropy inequalities characterize Riemannian curvature-dimension spaces, through the relationship between BCD(K,N)\mathrm{BCD}(K,N) and RCD(K,N)\mathrm{RCD}(K,N). The recent claim also addresses an almost-BCD\mathrm{BCD} condition and non-branching geometry.

Known results

  • Han and Liu, 2025: introduced BCD(K,∞)\mathrm{BCD}(K,\infty) and its finite-dimensional version, with entropy inequalities for Wasserstein barycenters.
  • Han and Liu, 2025: showed that on geodesic spaces, BCD\mathrm{BCD} implies the Lott–Sturm–Villani curvature-dimension condition and proved stability under measured Gromov–Hausdorff convergence.

September 2026 claimed solution

A September 2026 preprint by Bang-Xian Han and Deng-Yu Liu claims the equivalence of BCD(K,N)\mathrm{BCD}(K,N) and RCD(K,N)\mathrm{RCD}(K,N), introduces an almost-BCD\mathrm{BCD} condition, and derives essential non-branching consequences. This is a claimed resolution, not an independently verified one.

Current status (as of September 2026): Han and Liu claim the BCD(K,N)\mathrm{BCD}(K,N)–RCD(K,N)\mathrm{RCD}(K,N) equivalence, but the new preprint is unrefereed and independent verification is not recorded.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.