Chvátal’s conjecture

For every finite set XX and every hereditary family F⊆2X\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^X—that is, A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} and B⊆AB\subseteq A imply B∈FB\in\mathcal{F}—every intersecting subfamily A⊆F\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{F} satisfies

∣A∣≤max⁡x∈X∣{A∈F:x∈A}∣,|\mathcal{A}|\leq \max_{x\in X}\bigl|\{A\in\mathcal{F}:x\in A\}\bigr|,

where intersecting means that A∩B≠∅A\cap B\neq\varnothing for all A,B∈AA,B\in\mathcal{A}. Equivalently, F\mathcal{F} has a largest intersecting subfamily that is a star.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Correlation formulation of Chvátal's conjecture

    For every increasing Boolean function f:{0,1}n→{0,1}f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\} and every antipodal increasing Boolean function g:{0,1}n→{0,1}g:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}, meaning g=g∗g=g^* where g∗(x)=1−g(1−x)g^*(x)=1-g(1-x), one has, with respect to the uniform measure on {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n,

    Cov⁡(f,g)≥14min⁡i∈[n]Inf⁡i[f].\operatorname{Cov}(f,g)\geq \frac14\min_{i\in[n]}\operatorname{Inf}_i[f].

    source: Chang, Fan, Liu, Hong, Liu, Miao, “A proof of Chvátal's conjecture via a sharp correlation inequality”

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims to prove Chvátal’s conjecture, but the result has not yet been independently checked.

Chvátal’s 1974 conjecture asks whether every finite hereditary family has a largest intersecting subfamily formed by fixing one element. It has equivalent formulations involving correlation inequalities for increasing Boolean functions.

Known results

  • Sterboul (1974): the conjecture holds when all family members have size at most 33.
  • Schönheim (1975), Stein (1983), and Miklós (1984): several structural special cases.
  • Czabarka, Hurlbert, and Kamat (2017), and Olarte, Santos, and Spreer (2018): reproved the size-33 case.
  • Machine-assisted work (2018): verified all downsets with ∣U(D)∣≤7|U(\mathcal{D})|\le 7; the case ∣U(D)∣=8|U(\mathcal{D})|=8 was not established.

September 2026 claimed proof

Fan Chang, Hong Liu, and Miao Liu claim that a sharp correlation inequality for increasing Boolean functions yields the full hereditary-family statement, which would settle the conjecture. The claim is an unrefereed same-day preprint and remains unverified; earlier 2026 work had explicitly left the required off-diagonal inequality open.

Current status (as of September 2026): A preprint claims a complete proof, but the conjecture remains unsettled pending independent verification.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.