Un-Schur problem and Parczyk–Spiegel conjecture

For n≥1n\ge 1, let Tn={(x,y,z)∈{1,…,n}3:x+y=z}T_n=\{(x,y,z)\in\{1,\ldots,n\}^3:x+y=z\} be the set of Schur triples, and for a coloring c:{1,…,n}→{1,2,3}c:\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\{1,2,3\} let Rn(c)R_n(c) be the number of triples (x,y,z)∈Tn(x,y,z)\in T_n whose three entries receive pairwise distinct colors. Determine the asymptotic extremal fraction α3=lim sup⁡n→∞max⁡cRn(c)∣Tn∣\alpha_3=\limsup_{n\to\infty}\max_c\frac{R_n(c)}{|T_n|}. The currently reported bounds are 922≤α3≤815\frac{9}{22}\le\alpha_3\le\frac{8}{15}; the exact value is unknown.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new note disproves the earlier conjectured value and narrows the possible asymptotic fraction, but the exact answer remains unknown.

The problem asks for the largest asymptotic fraction of Schur triples that can be rainbow in a coloring, in the anti-Ramsey setting associated with the Un-Schur problem and Parczyk–Spiegel conjecture. The exact extremal fraction is not known.

Known results

  • An earlier study established asymptotic bounds 0.40.4 and 0.663640.66364 for the 33-color case and conjectured that 0.40.4 was optimal.
  • The same work developed extensions to rainbow kk-term arithmetic progressions.

September 16, 2026 bounds

Hegde, Kumar, and Pratibha report that the earlier conjectured extremum is false: the asymptotic fraction is bounded between 9/229/22 and 8/158/15, with an analysis extending to general kk-colorings. This is a claimed advance from a preprint, not an independently verified resolution.

Current status (as of September 2026): The exact asymptotic optimum remains open; a September 2026 preprint claims new bounds 9/229/22 and 8/158/15 and refutes the earlier conjectured lower-bound optimum.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.