Bounded sim-width and tree-independence conjecture

For every pair of integers t≥2t\ge 2 and s≥1s\ge 1, there exists a constant c=c(t,s)c=c(t,s) such that every graph GG with no induced subgraph isomorphic to Kt,tK_{t,t} and satisfying simw(G)≤ssimw(G)\le s also satisfies tree-α(G)≤ctree\text{-}\alpha(G)\le c. Equivalently, for each fixed tt, bounded sim-width in the class of induced Kt,tK_{t,t}-free graphs implies bounded tree-independence number.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims to settle the conjecture and substantially improves the quantitative bound, but the result has not been independently verified.

The conjecture asks whether excluding a fixed induced biclique from a graph class of bounded sim-width forces bounded tree-independence number. Earlier literature recorded this as unresolved, including the related question for induced matching treewidth.

September 2026 preprint

Mengyuan Niu and Xiumei Wang claim the implication for induced Kt,tK_{t,t}-free graphs, answering questions of Abrishami et al., Brettell et al., and Alon et al. They report the bound Ot((s+1)2t2−2t)O_t((s+1)^{2t^2-2t}), improving the earlier exponent 3t2+13t^2+1, together with a polynomial-in-tt bound when induced matching treewidth is fixed. This is an unrefereed arXiv claim, not an independently verified resolution.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is claimed solved by Niu and Wang's September 2026 preprint, with improved bounds, but the proof remains unverified; prior published sources treated the implication as open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.