Ding–Mossel monotone-censoring mixing question

For every psilon>0psilon>0, there exists a constant Cpsilon<∞C_{psilon}<\infty such that, for every n\ngreaterthanorequalto1n\ngreater than or equal to 1 and every increasing set A≠∅A\not=\emptyset in 0,1n{0,1}^n satisfying mu(A)≥εmu(A)\geq \varepsilon, the lazy random walk on the Boolean cube censored to AA has mixing time tmix(PA)≤Cεnlog⁡nt_{\mathrm{mix}}(P_A)\leq C_{\varepsilon}n\log n. The cited preprint gives the more explicit bound tmix(PA)≤Kmu(A)−3nlog⁡(en)t_{\mathrm{mix}}(P_A)\leq Kmu(A)^{-3}n\log(en) for an absolute constant KK.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A September 2026 preprint claims to prove the conjectured near-linear mixing time for every constant-density monotone censoring set, but the result is unrefereed.

Ding and Mossel asked in 2013 whether every monotone set of density at least ε>0\varepsilon>0 yields mixing time Oε(nlog⁡n)O_\varepsilon(n\log n). The question concerns the censored random walk on the Boolean cube.

Known results

  • Ding–Mossel (2013): a conductance argument gave Oε(n3)O_\varepsilon(n^3) mixing for constant-density sets.
  • Fei and Pinto Jr. (2025), with an alternate proof cited as Chen–Stein–Yau (2025): an optimal spectral-gap scale and an Oε(n2)O_\varepsilon(n^2) mixing bound.
  • A 2026 preprint proved O(nlog⁡n)O(n\log n) mixing with high probability for a uniformly random monotone set, but explicitly not for every set.

September 15, 2026 claimed proof

Yiming Chen and Yuval Peres report a uniform mixing bound for every increasing censoring set, with explicit density dependence, establishing the conjectured Oε(nlog⁡n)O_\varepsilon(n\log n) order. This is a complete-resolution claim in an unrefereed preprint and has not been independently verified in the retrieved record.

Current status (as of September 2026): A new preprint claims the universal Oε(nlog⁡n)O_\varepsilon(n\log n) bound, while the claim remains unverified; before it, the universal bound was only Oε(n2)O_\varepsilon(n^2) and the conjecture remained open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.