Disegni–Zhang conjecture on nonvanishing of local relative characters

For a nonarchimedean local field FF of characteristic zero and the relevant pair of representations (πn+1,πn)(\pi_{n+1},\pi_n) of GLn+1(F)×GLn(F)\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\times\mathrm{GL}_n(F), the associated local relative character is nonzero: Jπn+1,πn≢0\mathcal{J}_{\pi_{n+1},\pi_n}\not\equiv 0.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new preprint claims a proof in one restricted setting, giving limited progress but not settling the conjecture.

The Disegni–Zhang conjecture predicts nonvanishing of certain local relative characters. The newly reported work studies a conductor-one case through explicit calculations with opposite newforms.

September 10, 2026 conductor-one case

Dongwen Liu and Lei Zhang’s preprint claims to prove the conjecture in a conductor-one local setting using Rankin–Selberg integrals of opposite conductor-one newforms. This establishes a concrete new family of supporting cases, while leaving the general conjecture open. A separate source continues to use the conjecture as an assumption rather than proving it.

Current status (as of September 2026): A conductor-one local case is claimed, but the general Disegni–Zhang conjecture remains open and the new result is not yet independently verified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.