Kontsevich–Zagier conjecture
Every equality between convergent periods follows from the standard formal relations for periods: linearity of integration, additivity with respect to domains, and algebraic changes of variables. More precisely, if and are convergent integrals of rational functions with coefficients in over domains and defined by polynomial inequalities with coefficients in , and if as complex numbers, then this equality is derivable from those formal relations.
References
Primary source
Additional references
Progress summary
A new technical framework strengthens work around the conjecture, but no source reports a proof or disproof.
The Kontsevich–Zagier conjecture predicts that equalities between periods follow from the standard formal rules for periods. The general conjecture remains unsettled; the latest work extends machinery relevant to it without claiming a complete proof.
Known results
- Huber and Wüstholz proved the conjecture for classical periods of -motives over ; a 2025 preprint also develops related -adic results at depths and .
September 2026 framework
On September 8, 2026, the article Kontsevich-Zagier conjecture for Hensel-minimal fields with sections reported a new framework for motivic integration over Hensel-minimal fields and proved compatibility with the Cluckers–Loeser integral. This is claimed progress on supporting machinery, not a resolution of the conjecture.
Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is open; substantial special-case and framework results are known, but no general proof or counterexample was found.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- hal.science
- researchgate.net
- theses.fr
- ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
- annals.math.princeton.edu
- dialnet.unirioja.es
- arxiv.org
- semanticscholar.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- anthropic.com
- anthropic.com
- quantamagazine.org
- community.openai.com
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.