Dar’s conjecture and the log-Brunn–Minkowski inequality

For every integer n≥2n\ge 2, every pair of convex bodies K,L⊂RnK,L\subset\mathbb{R}^n containing the origin, and every t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1], prove that V((1−t)⋅K+0t⋅L)≥V(K)1−tV(L)tV\big((1-t)\cdot K+_0t\cdot L\big)\ge V(K)^{1-t}V(L)^t, where the logarithmic Minkowski combination is defined by h(1−t)⋅K+0t⋅L(u)=hK(u)1−thL(u)th_{(1-t)\cdot K+_0t\cdot L}(u)=h_K(u)^{1-t}h_L(u)^t for all u∈Sn−1u\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new unrefereed preprint claims a unified proof of both planar inequalities, while the higher-dimensional problem remains open.

The problem concerns Dar’s conjecture and the log-Brunn–Minkowski inequality. In September 2026, a preprint claimed a common proof in the plane and proposed, but did not prove, an extension to higher dimensions.

Known results

  • Xi and Leng proved Dar’s conjecture and established its equivalence with the log-Minkowski inequality for non-symmetric convex bodies.
  • The log-Brunn–Minkowski inequality was previously known in the plane.
  • The inequality was known for unconditional convex bodies in Rn\mathbb{R}^n.
  • A local inequality in dimension 22 for p=0p=0 gave another planar proof.

September 2026 unified planar proof claim

An arXiv preprint claims a unified “reverse-to-forward” argument proving both conjectures in dimension 22, and presents only a proposed strategy in higher dimensions. The proof is unrefereed and has not been independently verified in the retrieved sources.

Current status (as of September 2026): The planar cases are claimed proved but remain unverified; the higher-dimensional extension remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.