Adler–Rivara–Levin non-degeneracy conjecture for Longest Edge Bisection

For every nondegenerate tetrahedron T0⊂R3T_0\subset\mathbb{R}^3 and every resolution of ties between equally long edges, repeatedly bisecting a longest edge produces a family R(T0)\mathcal{R}(T_0) of tetrahedra that is uniformly nondegenerate: there exists a constant c(T0)>0c(T_0)>0 such that r(T)/diam⁡(T)≥c(T0)r(T)/\operatorname{diam}(T)\ge c(T_0) for every T∈R(T0)T\in\mathcal{R}(T_0), where r(T)r(T) is the inradius and diam⁡(T)\operatorname{diam}(T) is the diameter. A stronger formulation described in the source asserts an appropriate periodicity of the resulting orbit in projective shape space.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2026 preprint claims a counterexample showing that longest-edge bisection can produce increasingly flat tetrahedra, overturning the conjecture.

The Adler–Rivara–Levin conjecture asserts non-degeneracy for tetrahedra generated by longest-edge bisection, regardless of how ties between longest edges are resolved. A recent preprint claims this assertion is false and also reports further asymptotic and nonperiodic behavior.

Known results

  • Earlier numerical work suggested that longest-edge bisection does not produce degenerating tetrahedra and outlined a possible proof strategy.
  • The same work reported finite similarity orbits with lengths exceeding 3737, including 3838, 3939, 4242, 4343, and 4444, concerning a separate Adler orbit-length conjecture.

August 24, 2026 claimed counterexample

Sergey Korotov’s preprint The longest-edge bisection algorithm may produce degenerating tetrahedra, submitted on August 24, 2026, claims an explicit degenerating sequence. It says the sequence violates shape-regularity and both minimum- and maximum-angle conditions, implying that arbitrary longest-edge tie-breaking does not ensure non-degeneracy. The result is unverified.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture has a claimed explicit counterexample, but its correctness and the resulting refutation remain unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.