Common-neighbour conjectures for Saxl graphs; Kourovka Notebook Problem 21.29

Let GG be a finite primitive permutation group on a set Ω\Omega, and let bb be its base size. Define the generalised Saxl graph Σb(G)\Sigma_b(G) to have vertex set Ω\Omega, with distinct vertices x,y∈Ωx,y\in\Omega adjacent if and only if {x,y}\{x,y\} is contained in a base of GG of size bb. The common-neighbour conjecture asserts that every two distinct vertices of Σb(G)\Sigma_b(G) have a common neighbour; equivalently, for all distinct x,y∈Ωx,y\in\Omega, there exists z∈Ω∖{x,y}z\in\Omega\setminus\{x,y\} such that both {x,z}\{x,z\} and {y,z}\{y,z\} are contained in bases of size bb. For b=2b=2, this is the Burness–Giudici conjecture for the ordinary Saxl graph; for arbitrary bb, it is the extension formulated by Freedman, Huang, Lee and Rekvénnyi.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A new unrefereed paper claims counterexamples to the common-neighbour conjectures in every base size, while some special cases remain open.

The entry tracks two common-neighbour conjectures for Saxl graphs and Kourovka Notebook Problem 21.2921.29. The latest paper claims a broad negative resolution, but also proves the conjecture for one specified sporadic affine class.

Known results

  • Verification was known for primitive groups of degree at most 40954095.
  • The conjecture was established for almost simple groups with soluble point stabilisers, many sporadic cases, and most affine-type groups with sporadic stabilisers.
  • On December 27, 2025, separate preprints claimed the conjecture for several PSU(3,q)\mathrm{PSU}(3,q), Sz(q)\mathrm{Sz}(q), and Ree(q)\mathrm{Ree}(q) families.

September 2026 claimed counterexamples

The preprint claims counterexamples for every base size B≥2B\geq 2, including additional base-two families, and claims a positive result for a specified sporadic affine class. These results are unverified.

Current status (as of September 2026): A preprint claims the conjectures fail for every B≥2B\geq 2, but the claim is unverified and almost simple and diagonal base-two cases remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.