Margulis’s conjecture on boundary ergodicity

Let GG be a connected real semisimple Lie group of real rank at least 22, let P<GP<G be a minimal parabolic subgroup, and let Γ<G\Gamma<G be a discrete subgroup. If the action Γ↷G/P\Gamma\curvearrowright G/P on the Furstenberg boundary is ergodic with respect to the standard Furstenberg measure class, then Γ\Gamma has finite covolume in GG, i.e. Γ\Gamma is a lattice.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

An unrefereed preprint claims the conjecture is false in higher dimensions, but the counterexamples have not been independently confirmed.

Margulis’s conjecture asks whether ergodicity of a discrete subgroup’s action on the boundary of a higher-rank symmetric space forces the subgroup to be a lattice. The question originated with Schoen–Yau and was conjectured by Margulis.

Known results

  • Margulis: ergodicity on the product of two boundaries implies that the subgroup is a lattice, using Kazhdan’s property (T)(T).
  • Fraczyk–Gelander: a uniform upper bound on the injectivity radius of the quotient also implies that the subgroup is a lattice.

August 2026 claimed counterexamples

On August 27, 2026, the preprint On some aspects of discrete groups acting ergodically on the boundary claimed counterexamples for SO(n,2)\mathrm{SO}(n,2) with n>2n > 2, constructed by deforming smooth group actions. If correct, this refutes the conjecture in those dimensions; the claim is unverified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains unresolved in the verified literature, while an unrefereed preprint claims counterexamples for SO(n,2)\mathrm{SO}(n,2) with n>2n > 2.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.