Cusick’s conjecture
Let denote the number of ones in the binary expansion of , and for each integer define to be the natural density . Determine the asymptotic behavior, as , of . The claimed sharp asymptotic is as .
References
Primary source
Additional references
Progress summary
A June 2026 preprint claims the original conjecture is proved, while a newer report claims only a sharper estimate and neither claim has independent verification.
Cusick’s conjecture asks whether for every positive integer , where measures how often adding does not decrease the binary digit sum. The original conjecture is now the subject of a claimed proof, while the listed problem concerns a sharper quantitative asymptotic.
Known results
- Drmota et al. (2015): for a set of of asymptotic density one.
- Drmota et al. (2015): positivity for integers whose binary expansions contain sufficiently many blocks of ones.
- Drmota et al. (2015): for , , showing the bound is asymptotically tight.
June–August 2026 claimed resolution and refinement
On June 22, 2026, Kaimin Cheng’s preprint A first-exit proof of Cusick’s sum-of-digits conjecture claimed for every , hence a complete proof; this remains unverified. A report dated August 26, 2026 described a further claimed fixed-weight asymptotic, , but supplied no author or independent confirmation.
Current status (as of August 2026): The original inequality is claimed proved by Cheng but remains unverified, and the sharper fixed-weight asymptotic is likewise only claimed; no independent verification or disproof is recorded.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- emergentmind.com
- revistas.tec.ac.cr
- openai.com
- deepmind.google
- openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
- quantamagazine.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- cdn.openai.com
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.