Bürgisser’s width-two rectangular immanant problem

For a field FF of characteristic zero, let Imm⁡(2m)(X)=∑σ∈S2mχ(2m)(σ)∏i=12mxi,σ(i)\operatorname{Imm}_{(2^m)}(X)=\sum_{\sigma\in S_{2m}}\chi_{(2^m)}(\sigma)\prod_{i=1}^{2m}x_{i,\sigma(i)}, where χ(2m)\chi_{(2^m)} is the irreducible character of S2mS_{2m} indexed by the rectangular Young diagram (2m)(2^m). Is the family {Imm⁡(2m):m≥1}\{\operatorname{Imm}_{(2^m)}:m\ge 1\} VNP\mathrm{VNP}-complete under polynomial-size projections?

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new unrefereed manuscript claims to settle the problem by proving the relevant rectangular immanants are computationally complete.

Bürgisser’s problem asks whether width-two rectangular immanant families are VNP\mathrm{VNP}-complete in the arithmetic model. Earlier work established hardness results but left the stronger classification unresolved.

Known results

  • Brylinski and Brylinski (2003): partition families with separation Ω(nδ)\Omega(n^\delta), for some δ>0\delta>0, are VNP\mathrm{VNP}-complete under c-reductions.
  • Mertens and Moore (2011): variable-width-22 immanants are #P\#\mathrm{P}-hard; diagrams containing only the entry 22 give ⊕P\oplus\mathrm{P}-hardness.
  • Mertens and Moore (2013): the family of all partitions of width 22 is #P\#\mathrm{P}-hard.

August 25, 2026 claimed classification

A manuscript dated in the latest report claims VNP\mathrm{VNP}-completeness under p-projections for both width-two and length-two rectangular Young-diagram immanants, directly addressing Bürgisser’s question. This is a complete-resolution claim, but the preprint is unrefereed and no independent verification or reported proof-gap analysis was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The manuscript claims the width-two rectangular case is settled with VNP\mathrm{VNP}-completeness under p-projections, but that claim remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.