Liu–Ma–Zu’s digraph bisection question

For each fixed integer d≥1d\ge 1, determine the largest function Fd(m)F_d(m) such that, for every sufficiently large integer mm and every digraph DD with mm arcs and minimum semidegree δ0(D):=min⁡{δ+(D),δ−(D)}≥d\delta^0(D):=\min\{\delta^+(D),\delta^-(D)\}\ge d, there is a bisection V(D)=V1∪V2V(D)=V_1\cup V_2 satisfying ∣∣V1∣−∣V2∣∣≤1\bigl|\lvert V_1\rvert-\lvert V_2\rvert\bigr|\le 1 and min⁡{e(V1,V2),e(V2,V1)}≥Fd(m)\min\{e(V_1,V_2),e(V_2,V_1)\}\ge F_d(m). The claimed sharp bound is Fd(m)=d(m+d+1)2(2d+1)F_d(m)=\dfrac{d(m+d+1)}{2(2d+1)}, with equality for infinitely many values of mm for each fixed dd.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new preprint claims to prove the sharp answer, including perfectly balanced cuts, but the proof has not yet been independently verified.

The question asks for the sharp guaranteed size of both directed parts of a bisection in a digraph with prescribed minimum semidegree. The earlier formulation is attributed to Hou and Wu; the supplied sources do not establish the Liu–Ma–Zu naming or provide a separate posing date.

Known results

  • Hou and Wu’s 2023 result proved the asymptotic semidegree bound with an o(1)o(1) error and strengthened it to balanced bisections.
  • A 2013 result established related asymptotic bounds under minimum outdegree, including d=2,3d=2,3.
  • The minimum-outdegree-44 case was proved in 2020, with bound 314+o(1)\frac{3}{14}+o(1) times the number of arcs.

August 25, 2026 sharp-bound claim

A newly reported paper claims to remove the asymptotic error, retain balanced bisections, and prove that the additive term d+1d+1 is sharp through infinitely many equality examples. Its principal theorem applies for each fixed dd and sufficiently large arc count; it also gives a separate universal sharp bound. The claim is not independently verified in the supplied sources.

Current status (as of August 2026): The asymptotic and balanced-bisection results are recorded, while the sharp exact theorem is claimed by the 2026 preprint but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.