Strong maximum principle conjecture for higher-order GJMS operators

For every closed Riemannian manifold (Mn,g)(M^n,g) with n≥7n\ge 7, if Qg(2)>0Q_g^{(2)}>0, Qg(4)>0Q_g^{(4)}>0, Qg(6)>0Q_g^{(6)}>0, and the sixth-order GJMS operator P6,gP_{6,g} is strictly positive as a self-adjoint operator, then P6,gP_{6,g} has a positive Green function; equivalently, the associated sixth-order equation satisfies the strong maximum principle.

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new unrefereed paper claims a concrete example disproves the sixth-order version of this principle, while broader confirmation is still lacking.

Andrade, Piccione, and Wei conjectured that certain positive curvature conditions force the sixth-order GJMS operator P6P_6 to have a positive Green function. Case and Gover proposed a corresponding formulation for general order.

Known results

  • For special Einstein products, dimension thresholds D(k,ℓ)D(k,\ell) guarantee the strong maximum principle and a positive Green function for P2kP_{2k}.
  • The recorded bounds include D(k,0)=2k+1D(k,0)=2k+1, D(k,ℓ)=2k+2ℓ−1D(k,\ell)=2k+2\ell-1 for k=1,2k=1,2, and D(3,1)≤48D(3,1)\leq 48.

August 25, 2026 counterexample claim

A preprint claims that S2(1)×S5(1/100)S^2(1)\times S^5(1/100) satisfies the relevant positive curvature conditions and has positive P6P_6, yet a nonconstant positive eigenfunction below the constant mode causes failure of the strong maximum principle. This would disprove both the sixth-order conjecture and the proposed general-order version, but the preprint is unrefereed and the claim remains unverified.

Current status (as of August 2026): A preprint claims the sixth-order conjecture is false, but its counterexample is unverified; the general higher-order formulation and independent confirmation remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.