Existential Büchi arithmetic in two coprime bases

For all integers α,β>1\alpha,\beta>1 with gcd⁡(α,β)=1\gcd(\alpha,\beta)=1, determine whether the existential fragment of FO(Z;<,+,Vα,Vβ)\mathsf{FO}(\mathbb{Z};<,+,V_\alpha,V_\beta) is decidable; that is, whether there is an algorithm deciding every sentence of the form ∃x1⋯∃xn φ(x1,…,xn)\exists x_1\cdots\exists x_n\,\varphi(x_1,\ldots,x_n), where φ\varphi is quantifier-free in the language with order, addition, and the Büchi predicates VαV_\alpha and VβV_\beta. The cited preprint claims that this fragment is decidable.

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A new preprint claims to settle the existential case for two coprime number bases, while the broader theory remains undecidable.

The problem asks whether the existential fragment of arithmetic with addition, order, and power predicates for two coprime bases is decidable. The reported result claims a positive answer when the bases are multiplicatively independent.

Known results

  • For integers α,β>1\alpha,\beta>1, the existential fragment of ⟨Z;0,1,<,+,αN,βN⟩\langle\mathbb{Z};0,1,<,+,\alpha^{\mathbb{N}},\beta^{\mathbb{N}}\rangle is stated to be decidable; the proof uses Diophantine approximation and Baker’s theorem on linear forms in logarithms.
  • For multiplicatively independent bases, the full first-order theory is undecidable, with undecidability already appearing at bounded quantifier complexity; the negative result is attributed to Hieronymi and Schulz.

August 2026 preprint

The preprint On existential Büchi arithmetic in two coprime bases claims that the existential-fragment question is settled positively for coprime, multiplicatively independent bases. This would establish a decidable fragment inside an expansion whose full first-order theory is undecidable; the claim has not been independently verified in the retrieved material.

Current status (as of August 2026): The existential fragment is claimed decidable for coprime multiplicatively independent bases, but the claim is unverified; the full first-order theory remains undecidable.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.