Altun–Hancer–Ateş question on enriched P-contractions
Let be a normed linear space, let be nonempty, and let . Is it true that if there exists such that for all , then there exist and such that for all ?
References
Primary source
Additional references
Progress summary
A 2026 manuscript claims to settle the open question negatively by giving two counterexamples, but the result has not been independently verified.
Altun, Hancer, and Ateş posed the question in their 2024 study of enriched -contractions, which left one converse implication unresolved. The question asks whether that remaining implication between two contraction classes is valid.
Known results
- Altun, Hancer, and Ateş (2024) proved that an enriched -contraction on a nonempty, closed, convex subset of a Banach space has a unique fixed point.
- Their corresponding Krasnoselʹskiĭ iteration converges to that fixed point.
- Their examples showed that several other converse implications fail, including examples on a finite set and on .
August 2026 counterexamples
The manuscript On The Existence of -Contractions that are not Enriched Contractions claims two explicit counterexamples: one on a finite subset and one given by a continuous operator on an entire normed linear space. It therefore claims that the remaining converse is false; the manuscript is unrefereed, so this resolution remains unverified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The 2024 theorem and earlier separations are established, while the 2026 manuscript claims a counterexample to the remaining converse; that claim has not been independently verified.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.