Eulerian walker range conjecture of Priezzhev, Dhar, Dhar, and Krishnamurthy
Let each site of be assigned an independent uniformly random initial direction among its four outgoing directions. Starting at the origin, the Eulerian walker turns the arrow at its current site clockwise by and then moves along the resulting arrow. If denotes the radius of the set of sites visited during the first steps, then the conjecture asserts that has order (equivalently, the visited range has exponent ).
Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Range-exponent formulation
For the same Eulerian walker with independent uniformly random initial directions, the number of lattice sites visited during the first steps has growth exponent ; equivalently, the range is of order in the sense asserted by the conjecture.
source: Eulerian walkers on $\mathbb{Z}^2$ have range exponent $2/3}
References
Primary source
Additional references
Progress summary
A new preprint claims to settle the conjecture, but its result has not yet been independently verified.
The conjecture of Priezzhev, Dhar, Dhar, and Krishnamurthy concerns the long-term size, recurrence, and shape of the region visited by a two-dimensional Eulerian walker.
Known results
- Earlier work argued heuristically and numerically that the visited radius grows as , so the range scales as .
- Simulations found an approximately circular rescaled region and estimated boundary-width exponent .
- On graphs without endpoints, the dynamics was shown to enter a Poincaré cycle; this does not establish the conjectured range or limiting shape.
- The available literature treated these conclusions as heuristic or numerical evidence, not a proof.
August 24, 2026 claimed proof
On August 24, 2026, the preprint Eulerian walkers on have range exponent claimed the conjectured range exponent, infinite recurrence, and convergence of the rescaled visited region. This is a complete-resolution claim, but it is unrefereed and remains unverified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a new unrefereed preprint claiming all stated conclusions, but no independently verified proof is recorded.
Sources
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- arxiv.org
- quantamagazine.org
- mathoverflow.net
- export.arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- deepmind.google
- cdn.openai.com
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.