Erdős Problem #266 — Shifted Reciprocal Series
Is the following universal assertion false? For every sequence such that for every and
converges, there exists a natural number such that
is irrational. Equivalently, does there exist a sequence with for every and convergent such that, for every natural number , the series is rational?
References
Primary source
Additional references
Pinned Formal Conjectures source, Apache-2.0.
Progress summary
Never refreshed
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.