Open C¹,α regularity problem for singular fractional p-Laplacian equations

Let n≥2n\ge 2, 1<p<21<p<2, and let αloc(n,p)>0\alpha_{\rm loc}(n,p)>0 be an admissible interior Hölder exponent for gradients of local pp-harmonic functions. Is it true that, for every 0<α<αloc(n,p)0<\alpha<\alpha_{\rm loc}(n,p) and every s∈((p−1)/p,1)s\in((p-1)/p,1), every bounded weak solution of (−Δp)su=0(-\Delta_p)^s u=0 in B2⊂RnB_2\subset\mathbb{R}^n satisfies u∈C1,α(B1/2)u\in C^{1,\alpha}(B_{1/2})? Here (−Δp)s(-\Delta_p)^s denotes the fractional pp-Laplacian, formally given by (−Δp)su(x)=2 P.V. ⁣∫Rn∣u(x)−u(y)∣p−2(u(x)−u(y))∣x−y∣n+sp dy(-\Delta_p)^s u(x)=2\,\mathrm{P.V.}\!\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\frac{|u(x)-u(y)|^{p-2}(u(x)-u(y))}{|x-y|^{n+sp}}\,dy.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Near-local-order formulation

    For every n≥2n\ge 2, 1<p<21<p<2, and 0<α<αloc(n,p)0<\alpha<\alpha_{\rm loc}(n,p), there exists s∗=s∗(n,p,α)<1s_*=s_*(n,p,\alpha)<1 such that every bounded weak solution of (−Δp)su=0(-\Delta_p)^s u=0 in B2B_2 belongs to C1,α(B1/2)C^{1,\alpha}(B_{1/2}) whenever s∈(s∗,1)s\in(s_*,1).

    source: Zhang, Towards gradient Hölder regularity for singular fractional $p$-Laplace equations

References

Primary source

arXiv

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A 2026 preprint proves the desired regularity only when the fractional order is sufficiently close to one, so the full problem remains open.

The problem asks whether singular fractional pp-Laplace solutions have interior C1,αC^{1,\alpha} regularity for 1<p<21<p<2, with α\alpha below the admissible local pp-harmonic exponent. The complete range of fractional orders remains unsettled.

Known results

  • For p<2p<2 and s<(p−1)/ps<(p-1)/p, earlier work gives u∈Wσ,pu\in W^{\sigma,p} for every σ∈(0,ps/(p−1))\sigma\in(0,ps/(p-1)).
  • For p<2p<2 and s>(p−1)/ps>(p-1)/p, earlier work gives differentiability and ∇u∈Wσ,p\nabla u\in W^{\sigma,p} for σ∈(0,ps−p+1)\sigma\in(0,ps-p+1).
  • Global boundary results establish only CβC^\beta regularity for some β∈(0,s]\beta\in(0,s], not C1,αC^{1,\alpha} regularity.

2026 partial result near s=1s=1

Chao Zhang’s preprint reports that for n≥2n\ge2, 1<p<21<p<2, and 0<α<αloc(n,p)0<\alpha<\alpha_{\rm loc}(n,p), there is s∗<1s_*<1 such that bounded weak solutions belong to C1,α(B1/2)C^{1,\alpha}(B_{1/2}) whenever s∈(s∗,1)s\in(s_*,1). It explicitly presents this as partial progress; orders away from 11 remain untreated.

Current status (as of August 2026): C1,αC^{1,\alpha} regularity is established for ss sufficiently close to 11 in the singular range 1<p<21<p<2, while the full range s∈(0,1)s\in(0,1) remains open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.