Kippenhahn’s conjecture

For Hermitian matrices A1,A2Mn(C)A_{1},A_{2}\in M_{n}(\mathbb{C}), define p(z0,z1,z2)=det ⁣(z0I+z1A1+z2A2)p(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})=\det\!\left(z_{0}I+z_{1}A_{1}+z_{2}A_{2}\right). Kippenhahn's conjecture asserts that if there is a nonconstant polynomial qC[z0,z1,z2]q\in\mathbb{C}[z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}] such that q2pq^{2}\mid p, then A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} are simultaneously reducible; that is, there exists a subspace VV with {0}VCn\{0\}\subsetneq V\subsetneq\mathbb{C}^{n} such that A1VVA_{1}V\subseteq V and A2VVA_{2}V\subseteq V. The conjecture is false in this generality; the cited 2026 preprint claims a complete characterization of the remaining reducibility problem.

Progress summary

Solved

The original conjecture is known to fail in general, but an August 2026 preprint claims to give a complete characterization that resolves the remaining question.

Kippenhahn proposed the conjecture in 1951, linking repeated factors in characteristic polynomials of Hermitian matrix tuples to simultaneous reducibility. Its broad original form is false, but the precise reducibility problem remains the subject of current work.

Known results

  • Kippenhahn verified special cases where the relevant minimal polynomial has degree 11 or 22.
  • Laffey gave a counterexample in the 1980s; later work reports versions in orders 88 and higher.
  • Li, Spitkovsky, and Shukla (1998) disproved a more general form for n=6n=6.
  • A 2017 paper constructed a one-parameter family of counterexamples for Hermitian matrices of order n8n \ge 8.

August 2026 claimed resolution

Stessin and Yang claim that spectral index, spectral stability, and characteristic graphs yield necessary and sufficient conditions and “completely settle” Kippenhahn’s conjecture, including the Hermitian-pair criterion involving det(z0I+z1A1+z2A2)\det(z_{0}I+z_{1}A_{1}+z_{2}A_{2}). This is an unrefereed preprint claim with no supplied independent verification.

Current status (as of August 2026): The broad conjecture is disproved by counterexamples, while a new preprint claims to settle the refined general problem; that claimed resolution remains unverified.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.