Brenti’s log-concavity conjecture for \widetilde{R}-polynomials

Conjecture 2 (Brenti). Let WW be a finite Coxeter group. For u,vWu,v\in W with uvu\leq v in Bruhat order, define R~u,v\widetilde{R}_{u,v} by

q(u,v)/2R~u,v(q1/2q1/2)=Ru,v(q),q^{\ell(u,v)/2}\widetilde{R}_{u,v}(q^{1/2}-q^{-1/2})=R_{u,v}(q),

where (u,v)=(v)(u)\ell(u,v)=\ell(v)-\ell(u). Since all powers of qq in R~u,v(q)\widetilde{R}_{u,v}(q) have the same parity as (u,v)\ell(u,v), write

R~u,v(q)={Qu,v(q2)if (u,v) is even,qQu,v(q2)if (u,v) is odd,\widetilde{R}_{u,v}(q)=\begin{cases}Q_{u,v}(q^{2})&\text{if $\ell(u,v)$ is even},\\ qQ_{u,v}(q^{2})&\text{if $\ell(u,v)$ is odd},\end{cases}

with Qu,v(q)=iaiqiQ_{u,v}(q)=\sum_i a_iq^i. Then Qu,vQ_{u,v} is log-concave; that is, ai2ai1ai+1a_i^2\geq a_{i-1}a_{i+1} for every applicable index ii.

Progress summary

Solved

A new preprint claims the longstanding conjecture is false by giving an explicit counterexample, but the claim has not yet been independently verified.

Brenti’s conjecture concerns log-concavity of coefficient sequences of R~\widetilde{R}-polynomials. Christian Gaetz claims to disprove it with an explicit counterexample in an August 2026 preprint.

August 2026 counterexample

Christian Gaetz’s version-one preprint claims that the conjecture is false. The counterexample and its verification remain unrefereed and subject to scrutiny.

Current status (as of August 2026): A counterexample is claimed in a new preprint, but the conjecture is not yet regarded as definitively settled because the claim remains unverified.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

arXiv

Additional references

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.