The classification conjecture for complete \Phi_{\kappa}-sequences

From papers

Let p5p\geq 5 be a prime number, and fix κ{2,,p2}\kappa\in\{2,\ldots,p-2\}. A Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-sequence (an)n(a_n)_n in Fp\mathbb F_p is a sequence satisfying the recurrence associated with Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}, and it is complete when its terms run through the nonzero elements of Fp\mathbb F_p in the intended complete sequence. A primitive root bb in Fp\mathbb F_p is a Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-primitive root if bκ=b+1b^{\kappa}=b+1.

Classification conjecture. A Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-sequence (an)n(a_n)_n is complete if and only if

an=bna_n=b^n

for all nn, where bb is a Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-primitive root.

The claim would classify all complete Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-sequences by primitive roots satisfying the defining relation. The paper presents it as suggested by numerical data; the supplied text gives no resolution, so its status remains open.

Progress summary

Partially solved

The conjecture remains open: only several special cases are known, and no general proof or verified counterexample has been found.

The conjecture asserts that every complete Φκ\Phi_{\kappa}-sequence over Fp\mathbb{F}_p is geometric, namely an=bna_n=b^n for a primitive root satisfying bκ=b+1b^{\kappa}=b+1. The source presents this as a conjecture motivated by numerical data.

Known results

  • κ=2\kappa=2: Brison proved that every complete sequence has the asserted form, with bb a Fibonacci primitive root.
  • κ=3\kappa=3: the classification holds when ϱp<3\varrho_p<3.
  • κ=3\kappa=3: it holds when ϱp=3\varrho_p=3 and pNp2+1p\leq N_p^2+1; the finitely many computational exceptions below 10510^5 were checked individually.
  • Related cases for κ=p2\kappa=p-2, κ=p3\kappa=p-3, and κ=(p1)/2\kappa=(p-1)/2 are treated under corresponding hypotheses.

Current status (as of August 2026): The general classification conjecture remains open, with only the cited special cases and computational checks established; no verified general proof or counterexample is recorded.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Juan B. Gil, Michael D. Weiner and Catalin Zara, “Complete Padovan sequences in finite fields”, arXiv:math/0605348 (2006).

Solutions 1

Counterexample

The proposed characterization of complete Φκ\Phi_\kappa-sequences is false. Take p=73p=73, κ=19\kappa=19, and define, for every nZn\in\mathbb Z,

an=313n259n(mod73).a_n=3\cdot13^n-2\cdot59^n\pmod {73}.

Since

1319=14=13+1,5919=60=59+1(mod73),13^{19}=14=13+1,\qquad 59^{19}=60=59+1\pmod {73},

we have

an+19=313n(13+1)259n(59+1)=an+an+1.a_{n+19} =3\cdot13^n(13+1)-2\cdot59^n(59+1) =a_n+a_{n+1}.

Also a0=32=1a_0=3-2=1, and Fermat's theorem gives an+72=ana_{n+72}=a_n.

To verify completeness, put

q=13591=46(mod73).q=13\cdot59^{-1}=46\pmod {73}.

Then q2=1q^2=-1, so qq has order 44. Moreover, 5959 has order 7272, since

5936=1,5924=641(mod73).59^{36}=-1,\qquad 59^{24}=64\ne1\pmod {73}.

Therefore

H=594F73×H=\langle59^4\rangle\subset\mathbb F_{73}^{\times}

has order 1818. For n=4m+jn=4m+j, 0j30\le j\le3,

a4m+j=(594)m59j(3qj2).a_{4m+j} =(59^4)^m\,59^j(3q^j-2).

The four coset representatives tj=59j(3qj2)t_j=59^j(3q^j-2) are

(t0,t1,t2,t3)=(1,67,42,34),(t_0,t_1,t_2,t_3)=(1,67,42,34),

and their eighteenth powers are

(t018,t118,t218,t318)=(1,72,46,27).(t_0^{18},t_1^{18},t_2^{18},t_3^{18})=(1,72,46,27).

These values are distinct. Since the kernel of xx18x\mapsto x^{18} on F73×\mathbb F_{73}^{\times} is precisely HH, the four sets tjHt_jH are the four distinct cosets of HH. Consequently

{a0,a1,,a71}=F73×.\{a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_{71}\}=\mathbb F_{73}^{\times}.

Thus the sequence is complete and has least period 7272.

Finally,

a1=67,a2=42,a12=672=3642(mod73).a_1=67,\qquad a_2=42,\qquad a_1^2=67^2=36\ne42\pmod {73}.

Hence ana_n cannot equal bnb^n for any bF73b\in\mathbb F_{73}, let alone a primitive root satisfying b19=b+1b^{19}=b+1. Therefore a complete Φ19\Phi_{19}-sequence need not arise from a primitive root.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·