The fusion-realisation condition for arbitrary fusion rings

From papers

Let RR be a fusion ring and let (rs,t)s,tS(r_{s,t})_{s,t\in S} be a matrix satisfying the geometric conditions for a Coxeter system (W,S)(\mathbb W,S), as in the fusion-realisation condition: rs,s=2r_{s,s}=2, rs,tR0-r_{s,t}\in R_{\geq 0} and rt,s=rs,tr_{t,s}=r_{s,t}^* for sts\ne t, and the Frobenius–Perron dimensions satisfy the prescribed Coxeter-label conditions. The associated RR-sesquilinear form on RΛSR\Lambda_S defines a geometric faithful RR-realisation of (W,S)(\mathbb W,S). Fusion-realisation conjecture. Theorem 6.6 holds for any fusion ring RR, without assuming that RR is categorifiable. The conjecture would remove the extra categorifiability hypothesis from the construction of faithful geometric realisations; whether the theorem extends to all fusion rings is left open in the source.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Edmund Heng and Luis Paris, “Representations of Coxeter groups over fusion rings and hyperplane complements”, arXiv:2511.04836 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.