Elliott–Pestun's multiplicative geometric Langlands conjecture

Let GG be a semisimple simply-laced complex group, let θ\theta be a diagram automorphism of GG, and let CC be a Calabi–Yau Riemann surface. For any τAut(C)\tau\to\operatorname{Aut}(C), write Diffτ1(mHiggsG,θ(C))\operatorname{Diff}_{\tau^{-1}}(\operatorname{mHiggs}_{G,\theta}(C)) for the category associated with the τ1\tau^{-1}-twisted multiplicative Higgs moduli space, and Diffid(Conn(Gθ)τ(C))\operatorname{Diff}_{\operatorname{id}}(\operatorname{Conn}^{\tau}_{(G^\theta)^\vee}(C)) for the corresponding category of twisted connections for the Langlands dual group (Gθ)(G^\theta)^\vee. Elliott–Pestun's multiplicative geometric Langlands conjecture. There is a derived equivalence

mGLC:Diffτ1(mHiggsG,θ(C))Diffid(Conn(Gθ)τ(C)).\mathbf{mGLC}:\operatorname{Diff}_{\tau^{-1}}(\operatorname{mHiggs}_{G,\theta}(C))\longrightarrow\operatorname{Diff}_{\operatorname{id}}(\operatorname{Conn}^{\tau}_{(G^\theta)^\vee}(C)).

This conjecture is the multiplicative, diagram-automorphism-twisted form of geometric Langlands duality, predicting that S-duality exchanges GθG^\theta with its Langlands dual and τ\tau with τ1\tau^{-1}. The supplied source gives no resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guillermo Gallego, “Multiplicative Hitchin fibrations and Langlands duality”, arXiv:2509.14364 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.