D'Adderio–Iraci–Vanden Wyngaerd Theta conjecture at t=0t=0 for the (1,2)(1,2)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring

From papers

Let Rn(1,2)R_n^{(1,2)} be the (1,2)(1,2)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring, and let Frob(Rn(1,2);q;u,v)\operatorname{Frob}(R_n^{(1,2)};q;u,v) denote its multigraded Frobenius series. The notation Θek\Theta_{e_k}, Θe\Theta_{e_\ell}, \nabla, and eme_m has the same symmetric-function meaning as in the Theta conjecture, and t=0|_{t=0} denotes specialization at t=0t=0. Theta conjecture at t=0t=0. For all n1n \geq 1,

Frob(Rn(1,2);q;u,v)=k+<nukv(ΘekΘeenk)t=0.\operatorname{Frob}(R_n^{(1,2)}; q;u,v) = \sum_{ k + \ell < n} u^k v^\ell\left(\Theta_{e_k}\Theta_{e_\ell}\nabla e_{n-k-\ell}\right)|_{t=0}.

This is the t=0t=0 specialization of the preceding Theta conjecture and is used in the paper to derive evidence and formulas for the (1,3)(1,3)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring. Its resolution is not specified in the source.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

John Lentfer, “The sign character of the triagonal fermionic coinvariant ring”, arXiv:2501.09920 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.