D'Adderio–Iraci–Vanden Wyngaerd Theta conjecture at t=0t=0 for the (1,2)(1,2)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring

Let Rn(1,2)R_n^{(1,2)} be the (1,2)(1,2)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring, and let Frob⁡(Rn(1,2);q;u,v)\operatorname{Frob}(R_n^{(1,2)};q;u,v) denote its multigraded Frobenius series. The notation Θek\Theta_{e_k}, Θeℓ\Theta_{e_\ell}, ∇\nabla, and eme_m has the same symmetric-function meaning as in the Theta conjecture, and ∣t=0|_{t=0} denotes specialization at t=0t=0. Theta conjecture at t=0t=0. For all n≥1n \geq 1,

Frob⁡(Rn(1,2);q;u,v)=∑k+ℓ<nukvℓ(ΘekΘeℓ∇en−k−ℓ)∣t=0.\operatorname{Frob}(R_n^{(1,2)}; q;u,v) = \sum_{ k + \ell < n} u^k v^\ell\left(\Theta_{e_k}\Theta_{e_\ell}\nabla e_{n-k-\ell}\right)|_{t=0}.

This is the t=0t=0 specialization of the preceding Theta conjecture and is used in the paper to derive evidence and formulas for the (1,3)(1,3)-bosonic-fermionic coinvariant ring. Its resolution is not specified in the source.

References

Primary source

John Lentfer, “The sign character of the triagonal fermionic coinvariant ring”, arXiv:2501.09920 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.