The orbit-representation conjecture for integral points of XN,yX_{N,y}

About 2 years old · traced to

Let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} and y∈ΓNy\in\Gamma_N. Let η∈XN,y(Z)\eta\in X_{N,y}(\mathbb{Z}) be an integral point. For w^∈ΣW0\widehat{w}\in\Sigma W^0 and g∈Gg\in G, define the action g⋅w^g\cdot\widehat{w} as in the preceding notation. Orbit-representation conjecture. There exist w^∈ΣW0\widehat{w}\in\Sigma W^0 and g∈Gg\in G such that

g⋅w^=η.g\cdot\widehat{w}=\eta.

This conjecture is presented as a natural analogue of the earlier result referred to as the conjecture in the source, and has been checked for the first values of NN up to N=1000N=1000. Its general validity remains open.

References

Primary source

Olivier Brunat, Nathan Chapelier-Laget and Thomas Gerber, “Generalised core partitions and Diophantine equations”, arXiv:2403.11191 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.