The q-zero forcing conjecture for complete multipartite graphs

From papers

Let Gn,:=Kn,n,,nG_{n,\ell}:=K_{\underbrace{n,n,\ldots,n}_{\ell}} be the complete multipartite graph with \ell parts, each of size nn, and let Zq(G)Z_q(G) denote the qq-analogue of the zero forcing number. The q-zero forcing conjecture. For any n1n\geq 1 and 3\ell\geq 3,

Zq(Gn,)={n(1)if q=0,n2if q1.Z_q(G_{n,\ell})= \begin{cases} n(\ell-1) & \text{if }q=0,\\ n\ell-2 & \text{if }q\geq 1. \end{cases}

This conjecture extends the known zero forcing result for complete multipartite graphs to all values of qq; the supplied text gives no resolution, so it remains open.

Progress summary

Open

No verified proof or counterexample has appeared, although a 2025 paper says exact values for this graph family are known without showing that it settles this formula.

The conjecture proposes a two-case formula for the qq-zero forcing number of balanced complete multipartite graphs. No proposer, date, proof, counterexample, or verified resolution was identified.

2025 literature claim

A 2025 arXiv paper states that exact values of the qq-zero forcing number are already known for complete multipartite graphs and cites earlier work. The retrieved material does not give the formula, identify the earlier result, or connect it explicitly to this conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): No verified proof or counterexample for the stated conjecture was found; a 2025 paper claims exact values are known for complete multipartite graphs, but its relevance to this formula remains unresolved.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shaun Fallat, Neha Joshi, Roghayeh Maleki, Karen Meagher, Seyed Ahmad Mojallal, Shahla Nasserasr, Mahsa N. Shirazi, Andriaherimanana Sarobidy Razafimahatratra and Brett Stevens, “The q-Analogue of Zero Forcing for Certain Families of Graphs”, arXiv:2306.01138 (2023).

Solutions 1

Counterexample

The conjecture fails for part size n=1n=1. More generally, its exact corrected form can be proved for every parameter.

Let G=Kn,,nG=K_{n,\ldots,n} have 3\ell\ge3 parts and N=nN=n\ell vertices. Then

Zq(G)={n(1),q=0,1,q1, n=1,n2,q1, n2.Z_q(G)= \begin{cases} n(\ell-1),&q=0,\\ \ell-1,&q\ge1,\ n=1,\\ n\ell-2,&q\ge1,\ n\ge2. \end{cases}

For q=0q=0, the standard connectivity lower bound gives

Z0(G)κ(G)=Nn.Z_0(G)\ge\kappa(G)=N-n.

Conversely, color all vertices outside one part. The remaining white vertices are singleton components, and the q=0q=0 oracle can be offered one singleton at a time, enabling a colored vertex outside that part to force it. Therefore

Z0(G)=Nn=n(1).Z_0(G)=N-n=n(\ell-1).

Now suppose q1q\ge1. If the white vertices occupy at least two parts, their induced graph is connected, so there are fewer than q+1q+1 white components and the oracle rule cannot be invoked. If all white vertices occupy one part, they are singleton components. Whenever at least q+12q+1\ge2 are offered, the oracle can return exactly two. Every colored vertex outside their part is adjacent to both returned vertices, while every colored vertex inside that part is adjacent to neither. Hence no force is possible. This gives an oracle strategy neutralizing every special move, and therefore

Zq(G)=Z(G)(q1).Z_q(G)=Z(G)\qquad(q\ge1).

If n2n\ge2, coloring all but one vertex in each of two different parts produces a zero-forcing set of size N2N-2. Conversely, with at least three white vertices, any possible standard force must remove the sole white vertex outside some part, leaving at least two white vertices in that part; these cannot subsequently be distinguished or forced. Thus

Z(G)=N2(n2).Z(G)=N-2\qquad(n\ge2).

If n=1n=1, however, G=KG=K_\ell, and

Zq(K)=Z(K)=1(q1).Z_q(K_\ell)=Z(K_\ell)=\ell-1\qquad(q\ge1).

In particular,

n=1,=3,q=1n=1,\qquad\ell=3,\qquad q=1

gives

Z1(K3)=21=n2.Z_1(K_3)=2\ne1=n\ell-2.

Hence the original conjecture is false as stated, while its corrected version holds for all n2n\ge2.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·