Equality of the log mixed-motive categories

Let (LM)({\rm {LM}}\flat) and (LM)({\rm {LM}}\flat*) be the categories with the same objects and with morphisms defined using, respectively, the Chern class constructions from K0K_0 and from homotopy KK-theory KHKH. Let (MM)({\rm {MM}}) and (MM)({\rm {MM}}*) be the corresponding smallest full subcategories of contravariant functors generated by the functors Hn(T)(s)H^n(T)(s) and closed under kernels of morphisms. Equality conjecture. One has

(LM)=(LM)and(MM)=(MM).({\rm {LM}}\flat)=({\rm {LM}}\flat*)\quad\text{and}\quad ({\rm {MM}})=({\rm {MM}}*).

The equality would show that enlarging the morphisms using homotopy KK-theory does not change either the log-motive category or the resulting category of mixed motives. The source does not provide evidence resolving this claim.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kazuya Kato, Chikara Nakayama and Sampei Usui, “Mixed objects are embedded into log pure objects”, arXiv:2212.10970 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.