The Zassenhaus conjecture for torsion units in integral group rings

From papers

Let GG be a finite group, let ZG\mathbb ZG be its integral group ring, and let U(ZG)\mathcal{U}(\mathbb ZG) denote its group of units. A unit has finite order if it has finite multiplicative order.

Zassenhaus conjecture. If uU(ZG)u\in\mathcal{U}(\mathbb ZG) is a unit of finite order, then uu is conjugate within QG\mathbb QG to ±g\pm g for some gGg\in G.

This conjecture concerns the structure of finite-order units in integral group rings. The paper proves it when the Sylow pp-subgroup of GG has order pp, and gives further positive results for certain groups PSL(2,q)\operatorname{PSL}(2,q); however, it is false in a local form, and its general validity remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Equivalent formulations 1

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Zassenhaus conjecture for torsion units in integral group rings

    Let GG be a finite group and let uu be a torsion unit in the group of normalized units V(ZG)\mathrm{V}(\mathbb{Z}G), namely the units of augmentation one in the integral group ring ZG\mathbb{Z}G. Zassenhaus conjecture. There exists a unit xx in QG\mathbb{Q}G such that

    x1ux=gx^{-1}ux=g

    for some gGg\in G. The conjecture is one of the main open questions concerning torsion units in integral group rings; it asserts that every normalized torsion unit is rationally conjugate to a group element.

    source: Andreas Bächle and Leo Margolis, “HeLP – A GAP-package for torsion units in integral group rings”, arXiv:1507.08174 (2016).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

F. Eisele and L. Margolis, “Units in Blocks of Defect 1 and the Zassenhaus Conjecture”, arXiv:2212.06634 (2022).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2015–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1507.08174.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.